What is the "hwinfo64.exe" ? Variant 13461316

Our database contains 215 different files for filename hwinfo64.exe but this page contains information about single file with specific attributes. If you want to see general information about the hwinfo64.exe then visit General Information Page . You can also check most distributed file variants with name hwinfo64.exe. This file belongs to product Hardware Info Program for X64 (HWiNFO64) and was developed by company REALiX. This file has description HWiNFO64 Program. Agregate rating is 5(5) stars - based on 1 reviews.This is executable file. You can find it running in Task Manager as the process hwinfo64.exe.

hwinfo64.exe Process
Product:
Hardware Info Program for X64 (HWiNFO64)
Company:
REALiX
Description:
HWiNFO64 Program
Version:
4.0.4.0
MD5:
311b764dd608cd6433d45ea025b64069
SHA1:
90dcf1d9d9204403e1537a9ade4c214a3ed16b13
SHA256:
29a4016a159923c35eb356c3d2e2c38b4dcd8983fce7f01ed05d7e195d9e9040
Size:
4806824
Directory:
%PROGFILES64%\HWiNFO64
Operating System:
Windows 7
Occurence:
Medium oc1
Digital Signature:
Martin Malik - REALiX

System Explorer Community Antivirus Report

This file was checked and tolerated by following antivirus shields :
Antivirus NameLatest Toleration
Norton 3602013-04-07 10:13:02
Emsisoft Anti-Malware2013-02-14 07:06:28
avast! Antivirus2013-01-06 23:29:51
Avira Desktop2012-12-28 13:00:39
Antivirus shields were enabled and have latest antivirus database.

Is the Process "hwinfo64.exe" Safe or Threat ?

Loading Graph
100% of reviewed files are marked as Safe .
Our final rating for this file is Safe. Final rating is based on file reviews, discovered date, users occurence and antivirus scan results.

User Reviews of the "hwinfo64.exe"

  • SAFErating from user PhotM (Variant: 13461316)

    HWInfo64/32 is a safe and very good Hardware evaluation utility. I found out about it through yours site and they also highlight System Explorer as well. I have been using it for about 2 years now, with no difficulty. Martin is doing a great job and your info above appears correct.